Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Purple State of Craig
Because the conversation continues….
Where do monsters come from? Filmgoers may think Frankenstein arose in a mad scientist’s laboratory. But the vivid imagination of teenage author Mary Shelley brought her monster to life in 1818. Perhaps rising scientific experimentation fueled Shelley’s creativity. Frankenstein may have expressed the dislocation brought about by British industrialization. Hers was a handmade monster cobbled together from spare parts.
But historian W. Scott Poole traces how Frankenstein also stoked Americans’ fear of a slave rebellion. Shelley’s story fueled the anxieties that arose from Nat Turner’s 1831 revolt in Virginia. Monsters morph with our changing times and evolving fears.
While we can never isolate all the elements contributing to our horror stories, Poole looks at the distinct soil that produced Monsters in America. He lurks in the forests and depths that gave rise to Moby Dick, the Headless Horseman and even Bigfoot. Writing from his faculty position at the College of Charleston, Poole locates many of our manias in racial fears and tensions. Having grown up in the South, I find many points of connection with Poole’s potent analysis. (You can read an excerpt this month at the Patheos Book Club).
Poole grounds his research in ancient biblical stories of sea monsters, like the Leviathan in the book of Job. While it is easy to see how the unknown depths of the sea could spawn such speculation, it is tougher to understand why certain monsters arise in our own times. I was particularly fascinated by Poole’s discussion of the horror films, The People Under the Stairs (1991) and Candyman (1992). While easily dismissed as schlock films designed to scare teen audiences, these original stories by Wes Craven (Stairs) and Clive Barker (Candyman) are recovered as remarkably resonant in exploring issues of race, power, and privilege.
People Under the Stairs deals with exploitative landlords who take their control over residents too far (turning kids into zombies!). And the setting for Candyman in Chicago’s subsequently razed Cabrini Green public housing project adds an air eerie wistfulness to the bloody scares. It shamelessly trades upon white fears of a big, bad black man. But the backstory adds a historical twist that causes us to reexamine the our fears. For an ‘alternative’ historian like Poole, attention to our monsters opens up hidden corners of our national history that desperately need to be brought to light.
Monsters in America begins as an inventive mash up of genres and timelines. Poole describes Cotton Mather’s search for fossils proving the existence of the biblical Nephilim as a predecessor to the Salem Witch hunts. Having grown up in North Carolina, I was fascinated by Poole’s research on the Lost Colony of Roanoke and legends of a “deer woman.” Pool also makes haunting connections between the massacre of Pequot Native Americans with Herman Melville’s descriptions of the bloody whaling ship, Pequod. Monstrous actions in our collective history surface in the stories we continue to tell.
The second half of the book settles into a slightly more predictable rhythm. The science fiction films of the 1950s are linked to the fears of communism that gripped America. Zombie films like Night of the Living Dead are said to reflect the national confusion regarding war in Vietnam. Poole also connects zombies to a rising sense of apocalyptic dread. He links Rosemary’s Baby, The Exorcist and Carrie to women’s liberation, the sexual revolution, and the subsequent debate over abortion. Horror fans may not be used to thinking so sociologically about their favorite films. Poole offers historians a fresh way into complex and messy chapters in American history.
So what do our most recent monsters suggest about current conditions? Poole contrasts the rise of ‘gentlemanly’ vampires in Twilight with HBO’s over-the-top True Blood. He suggests that Stephanie Meyer’s influence on vampire mythology will pale in comparison to Alan Ball’s bayou bloodsuckers. But they represent two poles in our heavily staked culture wars, the abstinent and the erotic. The romantic idealism of Twilight may sell more units, but Poole suggests that the most unruly and subversive monsters always win in the end. With the political rhetoric in the race for the 2012 presidency only starting to heat up, it will be fascinating to see what monstrous spectres will appear.
Here it is–hotter than off the press–an electronic copy of my introduction to HALOS AND AVATARS on Scribd. Not sure if this is an official pre-release of the book or a pirated version of the book. Either way, this is the first I’ve seen of what may be the new cover.
And inside–an outline of all the various games me and my contributors tackle including Ultima IV, Madden NFL, Guitar Hero, Bioshock and Second Life. Thanks to all my sharp partners on the project. So check it out–an early Christmas gift to my gracious readers….
Anticipation is building for the December 18th arrival of James Cameron’s first feature in 12 years, AVATAR. Reports about the budget rising above $300 million have resulted in striking similarities to the fear and trembling in Hollywood that preceded Titanic. Cameron is one of the only directors who can secure so much financial backing on an original script. The studios don’t mind risking so much money on a known quantity like a superhero film (Spiderman) or a sequel (Transformers). But with Avatar, Cameron has brought an entirely new world of the Na’bi in eyepopping 3D technology. The New Yorker chronicled his chutzpah in remarkable detail.
While the initial trailer failed to meet expectations, star Sigourney Weaver suggests that fans will find the finished film irresistible. She figures three or four trips to the theater will become the norm. Surely, Fox is hoping for the kind of repeat business and word of mouth that blasted Titanic into gargantuan heights.
Today’s LA Times also highlights two interesting connections. A USC linguistics professor created the language assigned to the Na-bi tribe. Will it become a fanboys delight, rivaling their affection for the Klingon spoken in the Star Trek series? Or will it sound silly, raising regretable echoes of Jar Jar Binks?
The video game version of Avatar arrives tomorrow. Cameron wisely developed the game alongside the movie (rather than waiting to create an unsatisfying knock off of the film’s story). It demonstrates how much the lines between gaming and movies have blurred. Evidently, the University of California at Irvine has created a new major in game science. What was dismissed as flyweight entertainment just ten years ago, now has earned academic credibility. Sounds like the time is right for a book that studies the spiritual implications of video games and virtual worlds.
I just happen to have just finished editing a stellar collection of essays entitled, HALOS AND AVATARS: Playing Video Games with God. Honestly, I am thrilled by how well this book came together. My contributors are quite brilliant. The book raises surprising and timely themes about eternal tensions like predestination versus free will. And what will terms like ‘born again’ mean in a world in which everyone already has a Second Life and multiple Miis? In coming weeks, I hope to highlight the various chapters and contributors. But for now, how about ordering an early Christmas present—Halos and Avatars arrives in January.
Home | News & Updates | About | John's Blog | Craig's Blog | Movie Reviews | Media | Events | Community | Purple Interviews © 2013 Purple State Of Mind!